Comentários sobre: Frost/Nixon (2008) http://lamina.wordpress.com/2009/01/03/frostnixon-2008/ danger: helvetica Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:09:44 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Por: Joe http://lamina.wordpress.com/2009/01/03/frostnixon-2008/#comment-434 Joe Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:23:25 +0000 http://lamina.wordpress.com/?p=292#comment-434 Definitely true that Howard deals with serious subjects as if they were trivial in both Frost/Nixon and A Beautiful Mind. But this is the last time I answer any of your comments: I wasted 30 seconds of my life with you, 30 seconds I could've spent creating something. Go away, you and your evil clutches of scientology-sympathizing... Definitely true that Howard deals with serious subjects as if they were trivial in both Frost/Nixon and A Beautiful Mind.

But this is the last time I answer any of your comments: I wasted 30 seconds of my life with you, 30 seconds I could’ve spent creating something. Go away, you and your evil clutches of scientology-sympathizing…

]]> Por: maclaine http://lamina.wordpress.com/2009/01/03/frostnixon-2008/#comment-433 maclaine Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:35:43 +0000 http://lamina.wordpress.com/?p=292#comment-433 I can't agree with your claim that Ron Howard films usually deal with trivial subject matters, since defining what's trivial and what's not can be very subjective. John Nash's life, for example, is full of idiosyncrasies and contradictions leading to a remarkable story -- if not a smashing film. Therefore, I would rephrase your statement: Ron Howard films usually treat their subject matters as they were trivial. I can’t agree with your claim that Ron Howard films usually deal with trivial subject matters, since defining what’s trivial and what’s not can be very subjective. John Nash’s life, for example, is full of idiosyncrasies and contradictions leading to a remarkable story — if not a smashing film. Therefore, I would rephrase your statement: Ron Howard films usually treat their subject matters as they were trivial.

]]>