La Lamina Corredora

danger: helvetica

Harry Potter and the Order of Phoenix (2007)

with 2 comments

J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Order of Phoenix is the longest book in the series (a word count of 255,000) and its film adaptation is the shortest (138 minutes). For the first time, a new writer has been called in, Michael Goldenberg, replacing Steve Kloves (who will be coming back for the next installment). It’s hard to credit someone in the Harry Potter series, since there have been four directors, two screenwriters and one fairly inconsistent novelist; but one can notice that Order of the Phoenix departs in very serious ways from its predecessors. Now that we have Goldenberg to compare, it becomes clear that Kloves’ scripts were very faithful to the original novels, and in the case of Prisoner of Azkaban and Goblet of Fire, solid, nuanced and with the right amount of characterization and excellent pacing: none of these qualities are in this film.

It’s painfully noticeable that new director David Yates doesn’t have much of an idea of what to do with Harry Potter. Whereas Cuarón was carefully chosen as the director of Prisoner of Azkaban because of his A Little Princess, Yates had only a couple of political TV dramas to his name. Probably the producers felt that the political aspect of Order of Phoenix required a more political and socially-oriented director. Actually, one would be hard-pressed to find a more unsuitable option. He does a passable job most of the time, because he takes his cues from Columbus and Newell, mostly, and in the way, ends up making the same mistakes they did and some new ones. The film is at its weakest when the tone is dynamic: if a scene requires a change of tone, it’s always clumsy. Order of the Phoenix being the darkest and most serious of the series so far, practically every attempt at humor falls short.

A couple of early scenes illustrate this well. Harry goes to Grimmauld Place to find his friends and is nervous at Ron and Hermione because, as always, he’s the last to know bad things are happening. The tension here is lukewarm and the actors are stiff — to make matters worse, within a second, the Weasley twins magically appear and the tone changes awkwardly from anxious to comic. Cut to a lighthearted little sequence in which they try to eavesdrop (literally) in the Order’s meeting, and rightly after, one that begins with Nymphadora Tonks (what a name!) shaping part of her face to resemble a pig and a duck, desperate for attention. Two seconds later the tone changes again to one of uneasiness: it’s much too quick and unsubtle, and therefore neither tone succeeds. These little vignettes are typical of the two first films, where the humor was childish and quirky, and they don’t fit at all with the somber thematics of the film, much less when they’re in the same scene. There is next to no humor in this Harry Potter, because Yates is unable to balance the tones appropriately. The climactic scene with [spoiler alert] Sirius’ death is almost ruined because of that: it looks as if put together at the last minute, the director unsure of what it should look or feel like. The whole movie at that point depends on adroit tonal changes, but he just can’t handle it (Harry’s chasing of Bellatrix and giving over to hate) and much of the emotional range of the ensuing duel with Voldemort is thwarted.

Yates works well with the adult actors, and the early scenes in the Ministry of Magic with Harry’s trial are strong, and watching Michael Gambon and Gary Oldman in their roles is just delightful. Gambon is always a joy to watch, and his Dumbledore really comes to life as a major character — something that’s difficult to imagine with Richard Harris. And just watch Oldman as he fights the Death-Eaters with a truly graceful poise. This scene is definitely the high point of the entire film, if only on a purely visual level. It’s like watching the Jedi duels in Star Wars: The Phantom Menace for the first time: I know the film is horrible, but for the first time the Jedis were moving with impressive elegance and agility, and to finally watch fully accomplished wizards (not old men or apprentices) at the height of their powers is just as wonderful. Harry’s “occlumency” lessons with Snape (Alan Rickman) are also a high point, although much too short. Helena Bonham Carter appears briefly as villain Bellatrix Lestrange, but so briefly it’s more a cameo than a role, and I hope there’s more of her in subsequent movies.

Another particularly strong moment is the montage halfway into the film that shows Dolores Umbridge’s (Imelda Staunton) devious and slow overtaking of Hogwarts interspersed with Harry’s lessons to the other kids of more advanced spells in order to constitute an army to fight Voldemort. This is a major stylistic and structural departure from the previous films, as Steve Kloves had never employed such a technique. It’s ironic that it works well and is able to sustain some humor, but one gets the feeling that such montages, much like the overused newspaper headings that show up every so often, are facile summarizers and leave out much needed plot and character development. In Order of the Phoenix Harry feels troubled and isolated from his friends (something to do with Voldermort) and we see Ron and Hermione feebly trying to help him, but the dialogue and acting are substandard. Harry’s going through a rough patch and we only know that because he has nightmares and whines frequently. There’s really not enough room for them or any subtleties of character in this episode (the poor Ron is almost invisible for most of the time). And in a way, this approach betrays the story’s underlying theme: the final line of the film is that they will eventually win in the end against Voldemort, because they have what’s really important: friendship and love. Okay. Better put that into practice again!

Another annoying Columbus influence, in addition to the flat characters and the childish humor, is an over-reliance on the magical elements (to which Harry continues to be innocently amazed despite him having tons of things to worry about). That was okay for the first two films where everything was new and we didn’t know about owl-mail or fireplaces-transporters. There’s a big difference in showing this stuff when the time is proper and the tone is right. In Prisoner of Azkaban, little things like Harry’s monster book fitted well, but it seems totally out of place in Order of the Phoenix, with its insistence on politics. Here, we have a repetitious night incursion into the forest with Hagrid (reprising for the third or fourth time in the series!) to find a giant that will help our heroes later on. His help, however, turns out to be pointless and a lazy solution that could be better handled. Goldenberg at least had the decency of omitting Quidditch altogether. Yay. Oh, and as a first, we have lame one-liners in Harry Potter, a much misguided attempt at humor: “You may not like him, Minister, but you gotta admit… Dumbledore’s got STYLE!” and “Take your hands off my godson!”

It’s really unfortunate that Yates has already signed up as the director of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, the next one in the series. On the other hand, Steve Kloves will be handling script duties again, so that is a big plus. Hopefully Cuarón, who has expressed his will to come back to Harry Potter can be in charge of the last episode.

OBS: By the way, Steve Kloves wrote and directed The Fabulous Baker Boys (a nice review can be found here) and adapted Michael Chabon’s Wonder Boys for the Curtis Hanson film. He’s a nice guy.



Written by Joe

julho 25, 2007 às 8:57 pm

Publicado em film, reviews

2 Respostas

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. As a fan of the Harry Potter books and someone who has seen all the movies I can honestly say that I don’t think the person who wrote this review ever read the books. This was the best of the Harry Potter movies by far. It was very true to the book and I am amazed at the wonderful job the writers did in condensing the book for the movie. The prisoner of Askaban (my favorite of the books) was a huge disappointment to me because it strayed too far away from the books. The writers did a horrible job in that movie. I was sooo disappointed. I also think it is not very nice to insenuate the richest woamn in the United Kingdom is a poor writer. She has written books that intertain children of all agea and has inspired them to read more.

    teresa mckiernan

    agosto 4, 2007 at 12:22 am

  2. Teresa:
    thanks for your comments. You’re right, I am not a reader of the Harry Potter books but I’ve seen the movies a number of times. I’ve read most of the Philosopher’s Stone and bits of some of the books but I honestly didn’t have the time to pursue it. Funny you should say that the movie of Azkaban strays too far away from the books, because that is by far the best film in my opinion.

    As far as movies being faithful or not to the original books, it’s a difficult question, because there are a number of issues involved. Maybe the content doesn’t translate well to cinema, a completely different medium, so you have to work around it and try to create something new that will try to tap on the same the issues of a scene, for instance. Or time and budget constraints, differences in structure, etc. In a way it’s pointless for a film to be too faithful, and definitely not desirable. I’m pretty sure any movie 100% faithful would be a complete failure. And there are even movies that manage to be even better than the books, or that manage to be just as good, but different.

    And if the Harry Potter movies were only aimed for the fans of the book, there wouldn’t be much point to that either. The films are and should be standalone, and you shouldn’t have to have read the books to understand or appreciate them.

    As far as J. K. Rowling being a good writer, I don’t see what being rich has to do with being artistically successful. She’s a great businesswoman, that’s for sure. But a writer?


    agosto 4, 2007 at 12:39 am

Deixe um comentário

Preencha os seus dados abaixo ou clique em um ícone para log in:

Logotipo do

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Sair / Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Twitter. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Facebook

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Facebook. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Google+

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Google+. Sair / Alterar )

Conectando a %s

%d blogueiros gostam disto: